1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Seat 1500 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1963 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | Cimarron | 1500 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |