1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 50 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | Cimarron | Belmont |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 2130 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |
