1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1969 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1969 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Cimarron | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1983 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2900 mm |