1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1970 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 190 kg more than 1970 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1970 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Cimarron | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |
