1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 60 kg more than 1975 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Cadillac Cimarron 1975 Mazda Cosmo
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model Cimarron Cosmo
Year Released 1983 1975
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2843 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 94 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1150 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2520 mm