1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1979 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 190 kg more than 1979 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1979 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | Cimarron | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1983 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |