1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1988 Volvo 760
To start off, 1988 Volvo 760 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Volvo 760 (165 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Volvo 760 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1988 Volvo 760 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Volvo 760. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1988 Volvo 760 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Cimarron | 760 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2780 mm |
