1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1992 Skoda L
To start off, 1992 Skoda L is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1992 Skoda L. (57 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1992 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 265 kg more than 1992 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Skoda L is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Skoda L. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1992 Skoda L | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | Cimarron | L |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
