1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 650 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | Cimarron | F-Type |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2390 mm |
