1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser (161 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 750 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Cimarron | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |