1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2002 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2002 Renault Kangoo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2002 Renault Kangoo. (97 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 150 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2002 Renault Kangoo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Kangoo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2002 Renault Kangoo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | Cimarron | Kangoo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Panel Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |
