1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2002 Toyota F-1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota F-1 (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota F-1 should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota F-1 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Toyota F-1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Toyota F-1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Cimarron | F-1 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2710 mm |