1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2004 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 695 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2004 Isuzu D-MAX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | Cimarron | D-MAX |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3060 mm |
