1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2006 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2006 Lotus Elise is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lotus Elise (189 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 364 kg more than 2006 Lotus Elise.
Because 2006 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2006 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | Cimarron | Elise |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2310 mm |