1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK

To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK (148 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 540 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Cadillac Cimarron 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLK
Make Cadillac Mercedes-Benz
Model Cimarron CLK
Year Released 1983 2006
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2843 cc 2148 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 4200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1150 kg 1690 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2720 mm