1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 165 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | Cimarron | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2400 mm |