1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 234 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Cimarron | UTE |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 357 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |