1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2012 Honda Fit
To start off, 2012 Honda Fit is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2012 Honda Fit. (117 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 18 kg more than 2012 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2012 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | Cimarron | Fit |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 117 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1132 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1694 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2499 mm |
