1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 550 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2012 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Cadillac | Tata |
| Model | Cimarron | Nano |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2843 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1495 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2230 mm |
