1983 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 455 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Eldorado | 1951 Riley RM A | |
Make | Cadillac | Riley |
Model | Eldorado | RM A |
Year Released | 1983 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 4080 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2870 mm |