1983 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1976 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado (133 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 495 kg more than 1976 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado (270 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1983 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Eldorado | 1976 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Eldorado | Mark II |
Year Released | 1983 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4080 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2590 mm |