1983 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. (133 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 390 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado (270 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 1983 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Eldorado | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Eldorado | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4080 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |
