1983 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 377 kg more than 2009 Acura CSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Eldorado | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | Eldorado | CSX |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4080 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |