1983 Cadillac Seville vs. 1954 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Seville is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Seville (134 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Cadillac Seville has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Cadillac Seville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Seville | 1954 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Seville | 12 M |
Year Released | 1983 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4080 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2500 mm |