1983 Cadillac Seville vs. 1982 Mazda 121
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Seville is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 560 kg more than 1982 Mazda 121.
Because 1982 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Cadillac Seville | 1982 Mazda 121 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Seville | 121 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4080 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2520 mm |
