1983 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 358 more horse power than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 354 kg more than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar XKA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 646 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. (197 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chevrolet Blazer | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XKA |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 843 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1446 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2590 mm |