1983 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. (108 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 318 kg more than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer. (197 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chevrolet Blazer | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Blazer | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1446 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |