1983 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Renault Safrane

To start off, 1996 Renault Safrane is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Safrane (141 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Safrane should accelerate faster than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Safrane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Safrane (200 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Renault Safrane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Chevrolet Camaro 1996 Renault Safrane
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Camaro Safrane
Year Released 1983 1996
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2473 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 179 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4740 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2770 mm