1983 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Skoda Felicia
To start off, 1996 Skoda Felicia is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1996 Skoda Felicia. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1996 Skoda Felicia.
Because 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Skoda Felicia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Skoda Felicia. (100 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1983 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Skoda Felicia.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Skoda Felicia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
Model | Camaro | Felicia |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2473 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |