1983 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Honda Life
To start off, 2002 Honda Life is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2002 Honda Life. (47 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Life.
Because 2002 Honda Life is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Life will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Life. (57 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1983 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Life.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Honda Life | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | Life |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2473 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 57 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |