1983 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Mitsubishi SUP
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP should accelerate faster than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP (240 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm). This means 2002 Mitsubishi SUP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Mitsubishi SUP | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | SUP |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2473 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |