1983 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Kia Pregio
To start off, 2006 Kia Pregio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,665 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Kia Pregio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2006 Kia Pregio. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Kia Pregio.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Pregio. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1983 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Pregio.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Kia Pregio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
Model | Camaro | Pregio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2473 cc | 2665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 12 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2590 mm |