1983 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2010 Renault Symbol is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Renault Symbol. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Because 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Symbol, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Symbol. (160 Nm). This means 1983 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chevrolet Camaro | 2010 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Symbol |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2473 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1639 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2473 mm |