1983 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2013 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher.
Because 2013 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |