1983 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 3,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1983 Chevrolet Caprice. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1983 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chevrolet Caprice | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Caprice | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3753 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2490 mm |
