1983 Chevrolet Celebrity vs. 2000 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2000 Holden Commodore is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Celebrity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Celebrity would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Commodore weights approximately 250 kg more than 1983 Chevrolet Celebrity.
Because 2000 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chevrolet Celebrity, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chevrolet Celebrity | 2000 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Celebrity | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2471 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2950 mm |
