1983 Chrysler Executive vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1983 Chrysler Executive is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Executive is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Executive. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Executive weights approximately 530 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Executive, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Executive | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Executive | Elan |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2440 mm |