1983 Chrysler Executive vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1983 Chrysler Executive is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Executive is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Executive. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Executive weights approximately 940 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Executive, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Executive | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Executive | Elan |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2554 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2240 mm |