1983 Chrysler Executive vs. 1972 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1983 Chrysler Executive is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 5 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Executive.
Because 1972 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Executive, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Executive | 1972 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Executive | Challenger |
Year Released | 1983 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2554 cc | 5208 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2810 mm |