1983 Chrysler Executive vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1983 Chrysler Executive is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Executive.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Executive, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 260 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Executive.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Executive | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Executive | 260 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2660 mm |