1983 Chrysler Executive vs. 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Executive. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Executive would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Executive. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 365 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Executive. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Executive, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Executive | 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Executive | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |