1983 Chrysler Executive vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Executive. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Executive would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Executive is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Executive. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Executive weights approximately 230 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Matrix (167 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Executive.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Executive | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Executive | Matrix |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2860 mm |