1983 Chrysler Executive vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Executive. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Executive would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Executive.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Chrysler Executive. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Executive.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Executive | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Executive | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2554 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 180 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3010 mm |