1983 Chrysler Executive vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Executive. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Executive would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Executive is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Executive. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Executive. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Executive weights approximately 132 kg more than 2012 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chrysler Executive (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1983 Chrysler Executive will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Executive | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Executive | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2580 mm |