1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 1968 Holden Monaro
To start off, 1983 Chrysler Laser is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 2,638 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chrysler Laser (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Because 1968 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chrysler Laser (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Holden Monaro. (213 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1983 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 1968 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Laser | Monaro |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 213 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |