1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1983 Chrysler Laser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chrysler Laser (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 313 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Laser | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Laser | 66 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
