1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 1998 Mitsubishi SST
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi SST is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi SST (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi SST should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 15 kg more than 1998 Mitsubishi SST.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mitsubishi SST (296 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Mitsubishi SST will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 1998 Mitsubishi SST | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Laser | SST |
Year Released | 1983 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2570 mm |