1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (217 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Laser | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Laser | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 5699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
