1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chrysler Laser (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
Model | Laser | ESX 3 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 332 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3000 mm |