1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2000 Citroen C1
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chrysler Laser (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 260 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1983 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 2000 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | Laser | C1 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2350 mm |